‘Member when righties laughed at lefties who went nuts for sharing videos of the format “WATCH [Lefty TV personality] DESTROY/EVISCERATE/SLAY [Righty politician or issue]”? I ‘member.
And yet I see righties giving the same sort of treatment to similar clips from Fox’s Tucker Carlson Tonight.
The most recent virality involved Carlson taking on USA Today Deputy Editorial Editor David Mastio over an editorial noting that White House counselor Stephen Bannon and the Islamic State’s Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi share a belief in a “clash of civilizations between Islam and the West.” That’s not quite right; Bannon stated in 2014 that “we are in an outright war against jihadist Islamic fascism.” But USAT drew its conclusions (correct or not) based on the totality of Bannon’s comments about Islam, as noted in the editorial.
Carlson led off his segment with Mastio by means of a pop quiz:
Tucker Carlson sets the bar for Steve Bannon. pic.twitter.com/l2SfiiPB6T
— Nathan Wurtzel (@NathanWurtzel) February 9, 2017
Like Mr. Wurtzel, I tend to think “Bannon doesn’t behead journalists” comes across as damning the man with faint praise.
Carlson, however, does behead journalists, figuratively, and he draws quite an audience. Beyond the social sharing, his ratings are yuge.
This should surprise no one. Carlson knows the formula. In the long history of cable news morphing into infotainment, when Jon Stewart famously compared CNN’s Crossfire to pro wrestling, Carlson was one of his direct targets. (Carlson has claimed he never understood Stewart’s point.)
Of course, Tucker Carlson Tonight isn’t as scripted as the WWE. But it’s not unlike watching a favored heavyweight boxer work his way toward a title belt by sparring with a series of tomato cans.
On Crossfire, Carlson had to tangle with seasoned pros like James Carville or Paul Begala nightly. On Fox, virtually none of Carlson’s recent foils have nearly his experience in what passes for debate on television. And as often as not they are: C-list writers for outlets like the Huffington Post, Elite Daily, and Teen Vogue; generally unknown writers like Mastio or Fortune’s Mathew Ingram; writers with, um, colorful histories like Kurt Eichenwald; and the occasional businessman, college student, or random crank.
Even against inexperienced guests with weak-to-outlandish arguments, Carlson resorted to a straw man argument versus Mastio, and guilt-by association with Teen Vogue’s Lauren Duca.
Carlson’s obviously a smart guy and just as obviously talented on camera. But he risks re-enacting the moment in Gladiator where Maximus, after swiftly dispatching his vastly inferior opponents, bellows to the audience, “ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED!?” Because they clearly were not.
And even if the crowd remains entertained, you might ask how lefties giggling over the Stewarts, Colberts, Olivers, and Bees worked out for them. I can tell you from experience that junk food is tasty, but makes you flabby in excess.
PS: Consider subscribing to WHRPT in the sidebar (the posts come straight to your inbox; no muss no fuss). And following WHRPT on Twitter. Thanks for reading!